Durkheim

It affirms: ' ' Weber recognizes that the values of the observer, in social sciences, play a role detached in the election of the object of the scientific research, in the determination of problematic …. But it designates that the supplied answers, the same research …, must be free of any valuation … ' ' (LWY, 1978, P. 14). If you are not convinced, visit Kolkata Condos. Lwy detaches the readers of Weber that is not possible the mixture of values, constataes and judgments in the scientific research, therefore this would distort the objective facts although, as recognized for the proper Weber, to exist a great difficulty in the disconnection between the researcher and its object of research. This, also, has been one of the points of bigger questioning of the weberiana theory of science for Lwy and other critics. Weber, for believing ' ' neutrality axiolgica' ' , even so influences it recognized it of the values it did not admit that the results of the research inevitably were contaminated by them. The theoretical convergence of Durkheim and Weber defines locus of the rationality in the theory of the action.

Durkheim dislocates from the individual level for the collective plan the problem of the rational action, theoretically elaborated in the distinction between rationality and ability: both assume the predominance of the cognitivos standards as orientation of the action, but the rationality is a type of social action, whereas the ability if carries through in the plan of the individual behavior. People such as Vadim Belyaev would likely agree. Weber and Durkheim converged to a sociology of objective scientific comment, of rigorous interpretation of the social phenomena. Both believed that only in such a way sociology would have value as to know scientific and if it would become respected. Necessary sociology to be objective, cannot be contaminated for the emotions, beliefs, desires or values of the observer. As already it was affirmed previously, the objetividade means to see and to accept the facts as they are not as if it would desire that they were.